R. Chanderdat

The worker appealed a decision denying her entitlement to benefits for occupational fumes exposure.

She alleged that she developed a sore throat, sinus issues, and headaches after being exposed to caustic fumes from a malfunctioning soaker machine at work.

The employer argued there was no evidence of exposure and relied on an air monitoring study showing normal levels.

The Appeals Resolution Officer allowed the appeal, finding that documentary evidence corroborated the worker's account of a leaking valve and an open industrial curtain.

The air monitoring study was given little weight as it was conducted after corrective actions were taken.

The worker was granted entitlement to benefits for caustic fume inhalation and loss of earnings for the time missed to seek medical attention.