Application for statutory accident benefits dismissed due to lack of incurred expenses, surveillance evidence, and collateral benefits.
The applicant sought various statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including attendant care, physiotherapy, transportation expenses, and housekeeping benefits.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the application in its entirety.
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove the attendant care expenses were incurred or that the provider suffered an economic loss.
Further attendant care claims were denied as not reasonable and necessary, supported by surveillance footage contradicting the applicant's reported limitations.
The physiotherapy claim was dismissed because it had already been paid by a collateral benefits carrier.
Transportation expenses for gas, lottery tickets, and water were denied as they did not meet the 50-kilometer threshold for authorized transportation.
Finally, the housekeeping claim was dismissed because the applicant had not sustained a catastrophic impairment.
