The appellant appealed a License Appeal Tribunal decision denying him income replacement benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The adjudicator had preferred the medical evidence of the respondent's physiatrist over the appellant's physiatrist, concluding the appellant did not suffer a substantial inability to perform his pre-accident employment tasks.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding that the adjudicator applied the correct legal test and that weighing conflicting medical evidence does not constitute an error of law.
