The accused was charged with offering to transfer a firearm and offering to traffic in cocaine based on intercepted telephone calls and text messages.
The Crown relied on circumstantial evidence and expert testimony on coded language to argue the accused made genuine offers.
The court found the Crown failed to prove the jurisdictional averment that the offences occurred in Ontario.
Furthermore, the court held the intercepted communications only showed the accused acting as a conduit for information, not making a genuine offer to transfer a firearm or sell cocaine.
The accused was acquitted.
