The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied several treatment plans, and the applicant applied to the Licence Appeal Tribunal.
The Tribunal found that the applicant was statute-barred from disputing four treatment plans because she failed to apply within the two-year limitation period under s. 56 of the Schedule, and declined to extend the time under s. 7 of the LAT Act.
On the substantive issues, the Tribunal held that the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant failed to prove that a pre-existing condition, chronic pain, or psychological impairment warranted removal from the MIG.
Consequently, the remaining treatment plan for chiropractic services was denied, and no interest was payable.
The application was dismissed.
