Non-earner benefit denied as video surveillance and independent medical exams contradicted applicant's self-reported limitations.
The applicant sought a non-earner benefit following a motor vehicle accident, claiming a complete inability to carry on a normal life due to physical and psychological injuries.
The adjudicator dismissed the claim, preferring the respondent's independent medical examinations and video surveillance evidence over the applicant's expert reports.
The surveillance showed the applicant engaging in pre-accident activities such as shopping and walking without assistance, contradicting her self-reported limitations.
Claims for an award under Ontario Regulation 664 and interest were also dismissed.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalMar 18, 2019