The applicant moved to enforce an access review provision in a separation agreement, seeking to increase his overnight access to the child.
The respondent opposed and brought a cross-motion for dismissal, transfer of the file to Brampton, and a section 30 assessment.
The court granted the applicant's request for increased access, finding that the "review" test, not "material change" applied and that the increase was in the child's best interests.
The court also granted the respondent's request for a section 30 assessment but adjourned the file transfer request.
Costs were awarded to the applicant.
