This endorsement addresses cross-motions concerning parenting arrangements and child support.
The applicant mother sought joint decision-making with final authority, primary residency for the child T., specific parenting time, and child support for T. and her older son C. The respondent father sought sole decision-making or joint, a parenting coordinator, equal shared parenting, and a prohibition on the child's relocation.
The court granted the mother final decision-making authority (shared with tie-breaker), ordered equal shared parenting for T. (week on/week off), denied the parenting coordinator, and granted child support for C., finding the father stood in the place of a parent.
The father's request to prohibit relocation was denied as no such plan existed.
