The appellants appealed a motion judge's order requiring them to pay an additional $528,113 pursuant to a settlement agreement.
The appellants argued the motion judge erred in accepting the evidence of the respondents' expert accountant regarding management fees, professional fees, and benefits.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable and overriding error in the motion judge's factual findings or his decision to prefer the expert's evidence over that of an interested party, especially since the appellants did not object to the report's admissibility or file their own expert report.
