The moving party defendant brought a motion to compel the responding party plaintiff to answer undertakings and refusals from an examination for discovery, and to re-attend to answer follow-up questions.
The court ordered the plaintiff to answer most of the contested questions, finding them relevant to the pleadings, but declined to order production of communications between counsel and experts or the experts' files, citing a lack of factual foundation for improper influence.
The plaintiff was ordered to re-attend discovery, and the moving party was awarded costs in the cause.
