The appellant husband appealed a divorce judgment ordering him to pay an equalization payment of over $7 million and $35,000 monthly in spousal support.
He challenged the trial judge's findings regarding the ownership of the matrimonial home, the quantum of spousal support, unconscionability under the Family Law Act, and the disbursement of funds held in court.
He also brought a motion to admit fresh evidence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and the motion, finding no error in the trial judge's factual findings or legal conclusions, and noting the fresh evidence could have been discovered with due diligence.
