The respondent father moved for joint custody, increased parenting time, a relocation restriction, a custody/access assessment, and child support.
The applicant mother cross-moved for sole custody, reduced parenting time, permission to relocate, and child support.
The court declined to make an interim custody order, maintained the existing parenting schedule, ordered an update to the Office of the Children's Lawyer report instead of a full assessment, set child support payable by the father based on his 2015 income, and restricted the mother from relocating the child beyond a 15 km radius from her current residence without a further court order.
