The plaintiff, a scaffolding supplier, sued the defendant, a forest products manufacturer, for breach of contract after the defendant terminated its services.
The plaintiff claimed damages for unpaid demobilization costs and for scaffolding equipment that was allegedly contaminated and had to be scrapped.
The court found that there was no agreement for the defendant to pay demobilization costs, dismissing that portion of the claim.
However, the court found the defendant liable for the contaminated equipment, assessing damages based on 40 percent of the equipment being scrapped, and awarded the plaintiff $107,091.30.
