The father brought an interim motion for child and spousal support.
The mother opposed the motion and sought to impute income to the father, arguing he was intentionally underemployed as a real estate agent.
The court declined to impute income, finding the father's reduction in income was reasonable given his diagnosis of an anxiety disorder and his efforts to supplement his income.
The court also declined to include the father's past RRSP withdrawals in his income, as the funds were depleted.
The court ordered the mother to pay net child support and interim spousal support based on the parties' actual incomes, and directed her to reinstate the father on her employment health benefit plan.
