The applicant brought a motion to change seeking retroactive variation of child support, payment of section 7 expenses, termination of spousal support, and changes to custody and access including a week‑on/week‑off regime and decision‑making authority over daycare and education.
The respondent brought a cross‑motion seeking sole custody or, alternatively, final decision‑making authority over daycare and education, variation of child support, and clarification of section 7 expense contributions.
The court determined that the applicant did not meet the 40% threshold required for a shared custody set‑off under s. 9 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines and ordered table child support payable by the applicant.
The court accepted the respondent’s expert accounting evidence regarding income and rejected the applicant’s expert report as unreliable.
Joint custody and the existing parenting schedule were maintained, with after‑school care to occur at home with a nanny.
