2 total
A self-represented plaintiff's medical malpractice action was dismissed on summary judgment due to his failure to adduce expert evidence.
The defendants, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences and Dr. Omar Ghaffar, brought motions for summary judgment to dismiss a medical malpractice action.
The plaintiff, Donald Jameson Whitehead, failed to file any expert evidence or affidavit evidence in response, despite being self-represented and advised of the requirements.
The court found that the defendants had discharged their evidentiary burden by providing expert opinions that their care met the standard of care and that consent was properly obtained.
Given the plaintiff's failure to adduce expert evidence, which is generally fatal in medical malpractice cases except in the clearest of circumstances, the court concluded there was no genuine issue requiring a trial.
The motions for summary judgment were granted, and the action was dismissed.
The court imputed significant income to the payor based on undeclared foreign exchange gains and underutilized capital, denying a retroactive decrease in child support.
The respondent sought to vary child support orders made by the Hong Kong court, alleging a material change in circumstances following his termination from employment.
The applicant opposed the variation and sought to impute income to the respondent based on his failure to disclose and his underutilization of substantial capital assets.
The court found a material change in circumstances warranting variation but declined retroactive relief.
The court imputed employment income of $67,500 annually and notional investment income at 2% on the respondent's capital.
For 2014-2015, the court averaged the respondent's income at $438,205 annually (including undeclared foreign exchange gains), resulting in table support of $5,297 monthly plus 70% of private school fees.
For 2016 onward, support was reduced to $1,493 monthly based on imputed income of $106,804 annually.
The court ordered security for future support payments and dismissed the respondent's request for an order directing the children to attend public school.