The appellant and respondent owned adjacent bush lots.
A dispute arose over the boundary line, with the appellant relying on an old fence and the respondent relying on a recent survey.
The Director of Titles determined that the fence was the best evidence of the original boundary.
The Divisional Court reversed this decision.
On further appeal, the Court of Appeal restored the Director's decision, finding that the appropriate standard of review was reasonableness and that the Director reasonably applied the surveyors' hierarchy of evidence to conclude the fence marked the boundary.
