In a long-running high-conflict family property proceeding, the court continued a trial management conference and fixed a detailed timetable for final disclosure, limited questioning, financial statements, settlement conference materials, and trial preparation.
The respondent was permitted to amend his pleading to advance a claim for occupation rent, but his request for access to the matrimonial home with real estate agents was refused because prior orders barred motions.
The court also directed service of business records notice without redaction if hospital records were to be relied upon, required particulars for alleged defaults under prior orders, and scheduled a focused settlement conference concerning ownership and value of a specific property and the respondent's revenue from all sources.
Costs of the trial management conferences were reserved to the trial judge.
