The appellant mother appealed a Superior Court decision that dismissed her appeal of a summary judgment order granting Crown wardship of her two children with no access.
The mother alleged ineffective assistance of counsel on the summary judgment motion and sought to introduce fresh evidence.
The Court of Appeal found no error in the appeal judge's conclusion that motion counsel performed competently and followed instructions.
The Court also denied the admission of fresh evidence, noting it was an attempt to re-litigate the case and would not have changed the outcome.
The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Crown wardship order.
