The applicant mother brought a motion to change a separation agreement regarding parenting and support.
The respondent father sought retroactive termination of spousal support, claiming he was unemployed when he signed the agreement and the mother had significant investments.
The court granted the mother sole decision-making responsibility due to the parties' inability to communicate and the father's lack of involvement in the children's medical and educational needs.
The court dismissed the father's request to terminate spousal support, finding no material change in circumstances and affirming the mother's entitlement to compensatory support.
The court imputed income to the father due to undisclosed corporate and cryptocurrency income, and ordered him to pay his proportionate share of retroactive and ongoing section 7 expenses.