Following a trial judgment, the parties made submissions on costs, the proper name of the plaintiff, and the admission of an engineer's report.
The court declined to alter the trial costs disposition, finding that neither the pre-litigation negotiations nor the parties' conduct warranted a change.
The plaintiff was awarded $850 in costs for a dismissed eve-of-trial motion brought by the defendants.
The court granted leave nunc pro tunc for the plaintiff to proceed under its current name and declined to admit additional evidence or reopen arguments regarding the engineer's report, which had already been considered as hearsay.