The father brought motions to adjourn the trial and to increase his parenting time with the child, including overnight access.
The mother opposed the increase in parenting time and requested an update to a s. 30 assessment.
The court granted the adjournment of the trial due to counsel's unavailability and the need for the father to respond to an expert income report.
However, the court denied the father's request to change the temporary parenting order, emphasizing the principle against disturbing temporary orders prior to trial without compelling reasons.
The court also denied the mother's request for an updated s. 30 assessment due to the broken relationship between the father and the assessor, and made specific orders for further disclosure.
