Application for non-earner benefits dismissed as surveillance evidence contradicted applicant's claims of complete inability.
The applicant sought a non-earner benefit, medical benefits for transportation, and interest following a motor vehicle accident.
The applicant claimed that chronic pain completely prevented him from engaging in his pre-accident activities.
The respondent relied on surveillance evidence showing the applicant working as a pizza delivery driver and engaging in strenuous physical activity, as well as medical assessments indicating normal objective findings.
The Tribunal found the applicant's subjective reports of pain lacked credibility and were contradicted by the surveillance and objective medical evidence.
The application was dismissed in its entirety.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalDec 23, 2016
