The applicant mother brought a motion to terminate or supervise the respondent father's access to their child following allegations of sexual abuse.
The father brought a cross-motion seeking to enforce the existing final order, make-up access, and a finding of contempt against the mother.
The Children's Aid Society investigated and did not verify the allegations.
The court found the evidentiary record insufficient to make findings of sexual abuse and ordered that the father's unsupervised access continue, including limited overnight access.
The court also appointed the Office of the Children's Lawyer to represent the child and dismissed the balance of both motions.