Dr. Sedigheh Nasi

The applicant sought entitlement to statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, specifically claiming costs for physiotherapy, psychological services, and a multi-disciplinary catastrophic impairment assessment.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical evidence or submissions to prove the treatment plans were reasonable and necessary.

The Tribunal preferred the respondent's psychological assessment, which concluded the applicant had reached maximum recovery, over the applicant's evidence.

Claims for interest and an award for unreasonable delay were also dismissed.

The applicant sought various statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including an income replacement benefit and several medical benefits.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant was not entitled to an income replacement benefit because he was substantially able to perform essential tasks of his pre-accident employment, such as driving and carrying window samples.

The Tribunal approved two treatment plans for chiropractic services, finding them reasonable and necessary for pain management, and awarded interest on those amounts.

The claims for psychological services, an orthopaedic assessment, and an attendant care assessment were dismissed for lack of evidence demonstrating they were reasonable and necessary.

The respondent's request for costs due to the applicant's procedural non-compliance was denied.