Reconsideration request denied; no error of law or fact in finding injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline.
The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying income replacement benefits and various treatment plans on the basis that his injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued the adjudicator made significant errors of law and fact in weighing the medical evidence regarding his physical limitations, psychological impairment, and chronic pain.
The adjudicator dismissed the reconsideration request, finding no errors of law or fact in the original decision.
The adjudicator reaffirmed that the applicant failed to meet the burden of proving his injuries fell outside the MIG or that he suffered a substantial inability to perform the essential tasks of his employment.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalJan 13, 2021
