Reconsideration request dismissed; original decision properly weighed evidence and met sufficiency of reasons standard.
The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Licence Appeal Tribunal decision that found her injuries remained within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and denied her claims for treatment plans, massage services, an award, and interest.
The applicant argued the Tribunal misapplied the test for causation, erred in its assessment of a chronic pain expert's report, and failed to provide adequate reasons.
The Vice-Chair dismissed the request, finding that the Tribunal properly weighed the evidence regarding pre-existing conditions and functional limitations.
Although the Tribunal made a minor factual error in summarizing the expert's report, the Vice-Chair concluded this error would not likely have changed the outcome, and the original decision met the required standard for sufficiency of reasons.
OLATOntario Licence Appeal TribunalJun 5, 2026
