The applicant sought a non-earner benefit (NEB), interest, and an award following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the NEB and requested the applicant attend insurer's examinations.
The applicant challenged the sufficiency of the notices of examination and the experts' duty forms.
The Tribunal found the notices of examination were sufficient and that the applicant failed to comply with the rules for challenging expert reports.
On the merits, the Tribunal held the applicant failed to prove he suffered a complete inability to carry on a normal life, preferring the respondent's medical evidence which was obtained during the disputed period over the applicant's evidence obtained well after.
The claims for NEB, interest, and an award were dismissed.
The respondent's request for costs was also dismissed as the applicant's conduct was not frivolous or vexatious.
