Claim for taxi expenses to attend treatment dismissed; applicant failed to prove medical necessity or lack of vehicle access.
The applicant sought reimbursement for private taxi expenses to attend treatment for soft tissue injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident.
The insurer paid the public transit rate but refused the taxi fare.
The arbitrator found that the applicant failed to establish that taxi service was reasonable or necessary, as he had access to a vehicle and his treating chiropractor did not indicate any travel restrictions.
The claims for transportation expenses and a special award were dismissed.
The insurer was awarded its arbitration expenses due to the applicant's representative prolonging the hearing with unfounded arguments.
OFSCDRSOntario Financial Services Commission - Dispute Resolution ServicesApr 7, 2000
