Dr. Kia Azar

The self-represented applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, disputing the respondent's determination that his injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).

The applicant argued that he sustained psychological impairments and chronic pain that warranted removal from the MIG.

The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the respondent's clinical psychologist, who found no psychological condition removing the applicant from the MIG, over the applicant's evidence, which included a virtual assessment and procedurally excluded late-filed reports.

The Tribunal concluded the applicant's injuries were predominantly minor, dismissed the claims for treatment plans outside the MIG limit, and denied claims for interest and a special award.