1 total
Application for chiropractic benefits dismissed as applicant failed to prove treatment was reasonable and necessary.
The applicant sought $1,710 for chiropractic services following a 2019 motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the treatment plan based on a section 44 physiatry assessment.
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove the treatment was reasonable and necessary, as the supporting medical evidence predated the treatment plan by over a year and the contemporaneous section 44 assessment concluded the applicant had reached maximum medical improvement.
The application was dismissed, and claims for interest and an award were denied.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.