Two motions were heard by the respondents D.L. and T.S. in a child protection proceeding.
The first motion sought to vary the interim access order by increasing access to the children and permitting community visits.
The second motion sought an order prohibiting access by S.M.L.B. (the biological mother of one child) to J.L. The court found a material change in circumstances and granted a modest increase in access to D.L. and T.S., conditional on their participation in parenting programming.
The court rejected the motion to prohibit access by S.M.L.B., finding that supervised access was in the child's best interests and should continue.
