This family law trial addressed complex issues of decision-making authority, parenting time, mobility, spousal support, child support, equalization, and a restraining order.
The court found the respondent engaged in parental alienation and obstructive litigation conduct, including refusing therapy and sharing court documents with the children.
The applicant was granted sole decision-making authority and primary residence of the two minor children, with a 120-day no-contact restraining order against the respondent to facilitate reunification therapy.
The respondent's request to relocate the children to Switzerland was denied.
Spousal support claims were dismissed for both parties, and child support was ordered from the respondent based on imputed income.
