Dr. Hai R. Kim

The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT), as litigation guardian for the plaintiff, Ki Ho Kim, brought a motion for court approval of a $25,000 settlement in a slip and fall action.

Kim opposed the settlement and sought to set aside a prior order appointing the PGT as his litigation guardian, arguing he was no longer under disability.

The court reviewed multiple capacity assessments, all confirming Kim's mental incapacity.

The court dismissed Kim's motion, affirming his status as a party under disability and the PGT's authority.

The court then approved the proposed settlement, finding it fair, reasonable, and in Kim's best interests, and ordered the distribution of funds.

The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT), as litigation guardian for the plaintiff, Ki Ho Kim, brought a motion for court approval of a $23,500 settlement in a slip and fall action.

Kim opposed the settlement and brought a cross-motion asserting he was no longer a party under disability and did not require a litigation guardian.

The court reviewed multiple capacity assessments, all of which concluded Kim was mentally incapable.

The court dismissed Kim's motion to set aside the prior order appointing the PGT as litigation guardian, citing lack of standing and *res judicata*.

The court approved the proposed settlement, finding it fair, reasonable, and in Kim's best interests, and ordered the distribution of funds.

The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT), acting as litigation guardian for the plaintiff, Ki Ho Kim, brought a motion for court approval of a settlement to dismiss the action without costs.

Ki Ho Kim opposed the settlement, asserting he was no longer a party under disability.

The court reviewed multiple capacity assessments, all affirming Kim's mental incapacity.

The court dismissed Kim's motion to set aside the PGT's appointment, citing *res judicata* and his lack of standing.

The court approved the settlement, finding no viable cause of action against the Toronto Police Services Board and concluding that dismissal without costs was in Kim's best interests.

The Public Guardian and Trustee (PGT), as litigation guardian for the plaintiff, Ki Ho Kim, sought court approval for a $10,000 settlement.

Kim opposed the settlement, arguing he was no longer a party under disability and did not require a litigation guardian.

The court reviewed multiple capacity assessments, all of which concluded Kim was mentally incapable.

The court dismissed Kim's motion to set aside the prior order appointing the PGT, citing lack of standing and *res judicata*.

The court approved the settlement, finding it fair, reasonable, and in the plaintiff's best interests, and ordered previous cost orders against the plaintiff to be set aside.