The respondent brought a motion for a temporary order granting her sole custody or, alternatively, access to the children.
The applicant had previously obtained an ex parte order for sole custody due to concerns about the respondent's mental health and a potential relocation.
The court maintained the applicant's temporary custody but found insufficient evidence to justify continued supervised access, particularly given its limited availability and negative impact on the children's relationship with the respondent.
The court ordered a phased expansion of unsupervised access for the respondent, while prohibiting her from removing the children from Renfrew County.
