The applicants, acting as attorneys for Malzina Lozzi, sought an order to transfer title of a property from the respondent, who held it as a bare trustee, back to Malzina.
The respondent, also an attorney for Malzina, opposed the transfer, citing Malzina's original intention for estate tax planning and concerns about the applicants.
The court dismissed the application, finding that Malzina's intention for the respondent to remain the bare trustee was clear and that the applicants failed to demonstrate that transferring the property back was in Malzina's best interest.
