This judgment addresses the remaining issues in a family law dispute between parents concerning parenting time, child support arrears, and travel conditions for their young child.
The court primarily focused on the father's history of drug and alcohol addiction, lack of insight, and pattern of emotional abuse and harassment towards the mother.
The mother sought continued supervised parenting time and mandatory drug testing, while the father sought unsupervised access.
The court found the father's evidence lacked credibility and determined that supervised parenting time was necessary for the child's safety and well-being, imposing strict conditions for any future transition to unsupervised access, including a regimen of comprehensive drug and alcohol testing and participation in counselling and anger management programs.
