3 total
Landlord's claim to lease transfer proceeds in CCAA proceedings dismissed; secured creditor did not subordinate priority.
In the context of CCAA proceedings for Priszm, the landlord (Scott's REIT) brought a motion claiming entitlement to the proceeds from the sale and assignment of various restaurant leases to third-party purchasers.
Scott's argued it had a proprietary interest in the lease consideration and that the secured creditor (Prudential) had subordinated its security interest to Scott's claim.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the lease provisions created only an unsecured contractual obligation, not a proprietary interest.
Furthermore, the court held that the leasehold charge consents did not contain clear and unequivocal language demonstrating an intention by Prudential to subordinate its first-priority security interest to Scott's unsecured claim.
Arbitration award upheld; application and appeal dismissed for absence of manifest error.
The court dismissed both an application to set aside and an appeal from an accounting arbitration under an asset purchase agreement.
The moving party argued the arbitrator exceeded jurisdiction and made manifest errors by quantifying deferred-revenue adjustments without independent expert evidence.
The court held the arbitration agreement and engagement letter authorized determination and quantification of disputed deferred-revenue items, and that the award reflected a factually grounded analysis of known costs and contingency risk allocations.
The high threshold for court intervention was not met.
Summary judgment for fidelity bond coverage denied due to complex factual issues requiring trial.
The plaintiff credit union, in liquidation, brought a motion for partial summary judgment against its insurer under a fidelity bond.
The claim arose from an internal fraud perpetrated by the credit union's general manager, who engaged in an off-book deposit scheme that disguised a significant capital shortfall.
The insurer denied coverage, arguing that the plaintiff failed to prove a direct loss caused by the dishonest acts and that the losses were indirect or consequential.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the complex forensic accounting evidence required viva voce testimony and cross-examination at trial to determine causation and quantify the covered loss.