The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court decision dismissing his claim for breach of contract regarding the restoration of a 1986 Ford Bronco and granting the respondent's counterclaim for the balance of the contract price.
The appellant argued the trial judge misapprehended evidence regarding whether the vehicle was to be made drivable and improperly admitted an expert report.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's conclusions were grounded in the evidence and noting the appellant himself had introduced the expert report at trial without challenging the expert's qualifications.
