The accused was charged with five sets of robbery offences and several firearm-related offences.
The Crown's case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence, including surveillance video, cell phone data, and the recovery of a modified rifle.
The court found the accused guilty of the firearm charges and the robbery of the Sheppard Warden Pharmacy, concluding that the modified rifle found in his possession was the same one used in that robbery.
However, the court found the accused not guilty of the other four robberies, as the circumstantial evidence was insufficient to prove his identity as one of the perpetrators beyond a reasonable doubt.
