The accused was charged with robbery after allegedly stealing a rental vehicle, electronics, and a wallet from the complainant during a pre-arranged meeting.
The Crown's case relied entirely on circumstantial evidence, including a fingerprint found on the stolen vehicle and cell phone records linked to a residence where the accused's identification was found.
The court found the complainant's testimony credible and concluded that the combined circumstantial evidence, particularly the fingerprint on the passenger window, proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was one of the robbers.
