The respondent father brought a motion to change a final custody order less than two months after it was made on consent.
He sought joint custody and changes to the access schedule.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the father failed to establish a material change in circumstances as required by section 29 of the Children's Law Reform Act.
The father's relocation and the birth of a child in his new relationship did not constitute a material change, and his uncooperative behaviour was inimical to joint custody.
