The court considered whether to make temporary orders based on recommendations from a section 30 assessment in a family law dispute.
The court ordered the father to complete collaborative problem-solving training, limited telephone communication between the child and the non-residential parent, and established a right of first refusal for overnight care.
The court also placed conditions on the presence of the father's partner in his home, directed the parents to seek a psychoeducational assessment and counselling for the child, and requested the Office of the Children's Lawyer to consider appointing counsel for the child.
