The applicant wife brought a motion seeking to join the respondent husband's father as a party, requesting interim spousal support, and seeking extensive financial disclosure regarding the husband's ATV rental business which had been transferred to his mother.
The court dismissed the motion to join the father due to lack of evidence connecting him to the impugned transactions and his health issues.
The claim for interim spousal support was dismissed without prejudice, as the husband's income had significantly reduced after relocating the business, and his efforts to re-establish it were deemed reasonable, precluding the imputation of income.
However, the court ordered extensive financial disclosure from both the husband and his mother to clarify the business's income and the nature of the transfer.
