The applicant sought a constructive trust interest in the respondent's home after a 15-year cohabitation.
The court applied the unjust enrichment framework from Kerr v. Baranow, finding no joint family venture and no tangible benefit conferred by the applicant that unjustly enriched the respondent.
The applicant's claim for a constructive trust was dismissed.
A counterclaim for pet damage by the respondent was also dismissed due to lack of mitigation evidence.
