The applicant sought leave to appeal an order made at a Trial Management Conference that imposed conditions, including costs for a supplementary report, on the late filing of his expert report.
The applicant had breached a previous order setting deadlines for expert reports.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application for leave to appeal, finding no conflicting decisions and no reason to doubt the correctness of the procedural order, which was within the motion judge's jurisdiction under the Family Law Rules.
