Andrew Enofe sued Capreit Limited Partnership for monetary compensation due to alleged damage or disappearance of his property stored at an apartment building managed by Capreit.
Enofe claimed water damage, vandalism, or theft of his possessions, and sought damages for breach of contract and emotional distress.
Capreit argued it was a gratuitous bailee, only liable for gross negligence, and that Enofe failed to prove the property's existence, damage, or value.
The court found Capreit was a gratuitous bailee and was not grossly negligent.
The court also found Enofe's claims for property damage and emotional distress unsubstantiated.
The action was dismissed.
