The applicants (maternal grandparents) sought custody of their grandson, Grayson, from his mother (respondent).
The court assessed the best interests of the child, considering factors such as stability, the child's views and preferences, the caregivers' abilities, and exposure to family violence.
The court found that the child's primary residence should remain with the grandfather due to the mother's transient lifestyle, inconsistent care, and exposure of the child to domestic conflict.
Sole decision-making responsibility was granted to the grandfather, with a requirement to consult the mother.
Parenting time for the mother was ordered to commence via videoconference, with reconciliation counselling mandated before in-person visits.
The request for child support from the mother was dismissed due to her current stay-at-home status and pregnancy.
