Ariadna Randall

The applicant sought attendant care benefits and funding for chiropractic services following a motor vehicle accident.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal dismissed the claims.

The Tribunal found the applicant failed to prove the attendant care expenses were incurred pursuant to s. 3(7)(e) of the Schedule, and medical evidence indicated she had returned to her personal care and housekeeping tasks.

The Tribunal also denied the treatment plan for chiropractic services, finding the cost excessive and the treatment not reasonable and necessary given the applicant's pre-existing conditions and lack of functional improvement from past treatments.

The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident, including non-earner benefits, medical and rehabilitation benefits, and the cost of assessments.

The Licence Appeal Tribunal found that the applicant failed to prove a complete inability to carry on a normal life, dismissing the claim for non-earner benefits.

The Tribunal partially approved treatment plans for physiotherapy and psychological services, finding them reasonable and necessary.

Claims for chiropractic treatment, dental services, replacement eyewear, and various assessments were dismissed due to insufficient evidence or failure to prove they were reasonable and necessary as a result of the accident.