The appellant appealed his summary convictions for impaired operation of a motor vehicle, failing to comply with a demand, and dangerous driving.
The appellant argued that the trial judge misapprehended evidence regarding his speed and that the arresting officer lacked lawful grounds to make a Drug Recognition Evaluation demand.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding no palpable or overriding error in the trial judge's factual findings and concluding that the modified objective test for dangerous driving was met.
The court also upheld the lawfulness of the demands made by the officers.
